[rabbitmq-discuss] Flow Control
0x6e6562 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 00:48:41 GMT 2008
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Edwin Fine
<rabbitmq-discuss_efine at usa.net> wrote:
> I think that's a very fair compromise.
> So does that mean that when a consumer wants to perform a channel.flow,
> there will be a call made available on the channel, say
> amqp_channel:flow(true|false)? Otherwise, if the consumer sends a
> channel.flow command directly, it is inconsistent on an API level with the
> producer, which only receives pause and resume atoms. (a) Do you agree and
> (b) How do you plan to handle that side of it?
ATM the client can't initiate a channel.flow command, only the broker
(I mentioned this in the article).
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss