[rabbitmq-discuss] Implementation / Specification Stability?

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Perhaps have a realm for the services? Client users would be permitted
> only to write to exchanges/queues in the realm, and Server users would
> be permitted only to read (and of course to create
> queues/exchanges/bindings - this is the "active" permission).

Of course, clients need reply queues. You'd perhaps use either the
default realm, /data, for that, or set up a realm specifically for reply
queues, where the client user has active rights.

Tony
-- 
 [][][] Tony Garnock-Jones     | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
   [][] LShift Ltd             | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
 []  [] http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: tonyg at lshift.net