[rabbitmq-discuss] HTTP (was Re: Wild Rabbits)

[David Pollak]

On 12/3/07, Tony Garnock-Jones <tonyg at lshift.net> wrote:
>
> David Pollak wrote:
> > I'm not sure that works so well.  Many corporate firewalls have HTTP
> > proxies.  They expect well formed HTTP.
>
> One thing I've been thinking about for a little while now is use of
> HTTP/1.1's "Upgrade" header - cf. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2817.txt.
>
> A normal HTTP/1.1 request could arrive at an HTTP-speaking port, and
> through use of the "Upgrade" header, we could switch to AMQP.
>
> Would the proxies filter out the "Upgrade" header, do you think?


Probably not.  That's interesting.

Regards,
>   Tony
> --
> [][][] Tony Garnock-Jones     | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
>    [][] LShift Ltd             | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
> []  [] http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: tonyg at lshift.net
>



-- 
lift, the secure, simple, powerful web framework http://liftweb.net
Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20071203/6784af3d/attachment.htm