[rabbitmq-discuss] Python Client for RabbitMQ/AMQP?

[Martin Ritchie]

Alexis,

I'd be very interested in your list of mismatches with Qpid. I know
the Qpid Java client deviates from the AMQP spec to fully be JMS
compliant but I did add a property AMQP_STRICT which should turn all
that off so you can use the JMS client that will fit on the standard
0_8 AMQP. If there is somthing I have missed then I will gladly fix
it.

Our long over due M2 release will be available with the next week or
so. If you have been working with M1 then this is a major leap
forward.

I think it is great that our different groups can write clients and
brokers and use each others clients/test suites to validate our own
work.

Cheers

On 23/08/07, Alexis Richardson <alexis.richardson at cohesiveft.com> wrote:
> Jeff
>
> We want to fix this.  Do you have any other examples of mismatch
> between OpenAMQ and RabbitMQ?
>
> I think we've managed to nail down the ones for Qpid -- Matthias any comments?
>
> alexis
>
>
>
> On 8/23/07, Jeff Rogers <dvrsn at diphi.com> wrote:
> > Alexis Richardson wrote:
> >
> > > BUT - modulo the spec version, any client should interoperate with any broker.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it is the differences in spec version or just
> > incompletely or differently implemented servers but my limited
> > experience has not borne this out.  I was working on a tcl client and
> > ran into a number of small but annoying differences in how rabbitmq and
> > OpenAMQ deal with things.  For example, rabbitmq requires an
> > access.request call before accessing anything while openamq doesn't
> > implement access.request at all and gives you a channel error if you
> > even make the call.  On the side of rabbitmq doing things wrong, the
> > authentication is completely screwy - the server response says that it
> > only supports PLAIN authentication but the server only implements AMQPLAIN.
> >
> > Maybe this just points out a need for multiple independent clients to
> > test against;  particularly in the case of the authentication rabbitmq
> > seems to be making specific allowances for qpid even tho it appears qpid
> > is not following the spec exactly.
> >
> > -J
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> > rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> > http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexis Richardson
> +44 20 7617 7339 (UK)
> +44 77 9865 2911 (cell)
> +1 650 206 2517 (US)
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>


-- 
Martin Ritchie