<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/25/2014 03:46 PM, Simon MacMullen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_535A6734_1080502_rabbitmq_com"
cite="mid:535A6734.1080502@rabbitmq.com" type="cite">On 24/04/2014
12:53, Nagy, Attila wrote:
<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="Cite_4927063" type="cite">
<blockquote class=" cite" id="Cite_1957949" type="cite">Possibly.
In RabbitMQ consumer exclusivity means no more than 1
<br>
consumer can
<br>
be added on a given queue. This includes federation links for
<br>
federated queues.
<br>
</blockquote>
Exactly what I need.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
It's worth noting that no more than one consumer can be on one
individual queue, not one set of queues that are federated
together.
<br>
</blockquote>
Yeah, I was pretty sure it works this way. That would be fine with
me, if it would work.<br>
But from my quick evaluation it turned out, it doesn't (on STOMP).<br>
It would be nice to have this feature on it. <br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_535A6734_1080502_rabbitmq_com"
cite="mid:535A6734.1080502@rabbitmq.com" type="cite">
<br>
No. And really there couldn't be; in order to do that you'd need
some distributed shared state, which would have to be Consistent
and Available, thius not Partition Tolerant, thus not really
compatible with how federation works.
<br>
</blockquote>
Agreed.<br>
<br>
Thank you both for the answers.<br>
</body>
</html>