<div dir="ltr">Yes. With only that binding, things are working and I can see the message in test-receive-users queue. The problems start when I start adding bindings and messages. We have had it working with a few bindings (5-10 approx) but when we start putting load on it (5000 bindings approx) it seems to just die.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">Best regards<br>Patrik Ring<br><br>Co-founder and CTO of Bloglovin.com<br><a href="mailto:patrik.ring@bloglovin.com" target="_blank">patrik.ring@bloglovin.com</a><br>
+46 730 59 78 14<div>+1 347 859 7999</div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Simon MacMullen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simon@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">simon@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Patrik, thanks.<br>
<br>
So this looks like federation is configured correctly and should be working normally. The downstream exchange only has a single binding to a single queue, with routing key "user.2". Are messages being published upstream with that key?<br>
<br>
Cheers, Simon<div class=""><br>
<br>
On 04/03/14 22:06, Patrik Ring wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">
Rabbit version in use is: RabbitMQ 3.2.1, Erlang R14B04<br>
<br>
rabbitmqctl report on<br>
upstream: <a href="http://pastebin.com/PNqTziGk" target="_blank">http://pastebin.com/PNqTziGk</a><br>
"slave" server: <a href="http://pastebin.com/4L6JFsiW" target="_blank">http://pastebin.com/4L6JFsiW</a><br>
<br></div>
*I have this in the exchanges list on the upstream:*<div class=""><br>
<br>
federation: users -> rabbit@rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.<u></u>internal B<br></div>
<<a href="http://rabbit1:15672/#/exchanges/%2F/federation%3A%20users%20-%3E%20rabbit%40rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.internal%20B" target="_blank">http://rabbit1:15672/#/<u></u>exchanges/%2F/federation%3A%<u></u>20users%20-%3E%20rabbit%<u></u>40rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.<u></u>internal%20B</a>><div class="">
<br>
x-federation-upstream ha-all D AD I Args<br>
<br>
<br>
And this i the queues list:<br>
<br>
federation: users -> rabbit@rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.<u></u>internal<br></div>
<<a href="http://rabbit1:15672/#/queues/%2F/federation%3A%20users%20-%3E%20rabbit%40rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.internal" target="_blank">http://rabbit1:15672/#/<u></u>queues/%2F/federation%3A%<u></u>20users%20-%3E%20rabbit%<u></u>40rabbit3.c.rabbit-magic.<u></u>internal</a>><div class="">
<br>
rabbit@util1 +1 Exp D Args<br>
<br>
<br></div>
*For the slave:*<br>
*<br>
*<br>
*Nothing.* Except on channels, where I find this:<br>
<br>
<rabbit@rabbit3.3.237.0> (1)<br>
<<a href="http://162.222.179.163:15672/#/channels/%3Crabbit%40rabbit3.3.237.0%3E%20(1)" target="_blank">http://162.222.179.163:15672/<u></u>#/channels/%3Crabbit%<u></u>40rabbit3.3.237.0%3E%20(1)</a>><div class=""><br>
federation<br>
<br>
<br>
Feel like we might be on to something?<br>
<br>
How do I set this up?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
As a side note: The queues and exchanges on the upstream might still be<br>
there since when we tried making it run both ways, not sure about this.<br>
We do however have the federation status on the SLAVE, and according to<br>
that it's up and running.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
Patrik Ring<br>
<br>
Co-founder and CTO of Bloglovin.com<br>
</div><a href="mailto:patrik.ring@bloglovin.com" target="_blank">patrik.ring@bloglovin.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:patrik.ring@bloglovin.com" target="_blank">patrik.ring@bloglovin.<u></u>com</a>><div class=""><br>
<a href="tel:%2B46%20730%2059%2078%2014" value="+46730597814" target="_blank">+46 730 59 78 14</a><br>
<a href="tel:%2B1%20347%20859%207999" value="+13478597999" target="_blank">+1 347 859 7999</a><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Simon MacMullen <<a href="mailto:simon@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">simon@rabbitmq.com</a><br></div><div><div class="h5">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:simon@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">simon@rabbitmq.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi Patrik.<br>
<br>
On 03/03/14 21:41, Patrik Ring wrote:<br>
<br>
Some messages come through (but are heavily delayed, as in<br>
hours) but<br>
they seem completely random.<br>
<br>
<br>
That's definitely not right!<br>
<br>
First of all, could you send the output of "rabbitmqctl report" for<br>
each broker?<br>
<br>
Also, which version of RabbitMQ are you using?<br>
<br>
Secondly, you might want to investigate whether the underlying<br>
infrastructure used by federation is wired up correctly. There<br>
should be a queue for each (exchange, downstream) pairing declared<br>
in the upstream broker (called "federation: [exchange] -> [node]").<br>
It should be bound (once) to an internal exchange with a similar<br>
name. That internal exchange should be bound to the upstream<br>
exchange with all the bindings that are in use downstream.<br>
<br>
Does it look like that is happening? Is the infrastructure queue<br>
seeing the message rates you would expect?<br>
<br>
Cheers, Simon<br>
<br>
--<br>
Simon MacMullen<br>
RabbitMQ, Pivotal<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Simon MacMullen<br>
RabbitMQ, Pivotal<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>