<div dir="ltr">Thanks for the quick answer !</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Simon MacMullen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simon@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">simon@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">No. You can assume that order is maintained *per publisher* - you will never see {a,2},{a,1} - but the interleaving between publishers is not guaranteed to be the same.<br>
<br>
Cheers, Simon<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 19/11/2013 09:27, Stone Shi wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
Hi guys.<br>
<br>
If I have e.g. a topic exchange, two publishers, and two queues bind to<br>
the exchange.<br>
lets say we have 4 messages published "at the same time",<br>
{a,1}, {a,2} from publisher A<br>
{b,1}, {b,2} from publisher B<br>
if it's ended up with {b,1},{a,1},{a,2},{b,2} in one queue, can I assume<br>
the same order in the other queue?<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
-Stone<br>
<br>
<br>
<br></div></div>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.<u></u>rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>