<div dir="ltr">Thank you MK.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Michael Klishin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mklishin@gopivotal.com" target="_blank">mklishin@gopivotal.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 22 Oct 2013, at 13:33, Rajasekhar P <<a href="mailto:sekhar434145@gmail.com">sekhar434145@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> 1> setting ConcurrentConsumers property (Container.setConcurrentConsumers(2)) and running in consumer program in single thread<br>
> 2> running consumer program in two threads without ConcurrentConsumers property.<br>
><br>
> Could any one help me on this which is correct option? Thanks in advance!<br>
<br>
</div>1 is the right thing to use in production.<br>
2 will give you more flexibility in tests, e.g. close one consumer channel in tests.<br>
<br>
MK<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>