<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
I found one benchmark of different MQ servers, which included
STOMP and AMQP on RabbitMQ. STOMP was much slower :(<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a
href="http://x-aeon.com/wp/2013/04/10/a-quick-message-queue-benchmark-activemq-rabbitmq-hornetq-qpid-apollo/">http://x-aeon.com/wp/2013/04/10/a-quick-message-queue-benchmark-activemq-rabbitmq-hornetq-qpid-apollo/</a><br>
<br>
Will try to implement STOMP on producers and will let you know if
it works better from client and server point of view :)<br>
<br>
On 05/23/2013 03:23 PM, Matthias Radestock wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:519E185A.2080001@rabbitmq.com" type="cite">Nikola,
<br>
<br>
On 19/05/13 15:06, Nikola Savic wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Would STOMP be better approach to connect
to RabbitMQ from PHP?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
STOMP's connection establishment handshake has fewer steps, so for
a connect-publish-disconnect scenario might well be quicker than
AMQP. Though the only way to be sure is to test it :)
<br>
<br>
Matthias.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>