<html><head><base href="x-msg://591/"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Marek,<div><br></div><div><div><div>On 3 Apr 2013, at 13:52, Cermak, Marek wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; "><div style="margin-top: 0mm; margin-right: 0mm; margin-left: 0mm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Georgia, serif; color: black; ">I would reckon that 'slowing down' the transfer from disk to memory may be a way to go.</span></div></div></div></span></blockquote><div><br></div></div></div><div>You could set a low (ish) prefetch count in your consumer so as to only bring 'n' messages off the disk at a time and then only ACK them (in batch mode or otherwise) when you're done with them, thereby slowing things down.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Tim</div></body></html>