<div dir="ltr">Matthias,<div><br></div><div>Thanks again, so this means that even though the queue is durable, since it's mirrored, the durability won't matter in this case until the last node goes down. So if the last node goes down and it restarts, since it's coming up as the first node and it's queue is durable, then it will just come back up with that queue still in tact. Right?</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Matthias Radestock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthias@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">matthias@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Eugene,<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 29/12/12 03:21, Eugene Vasilchenko wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
So if I understand it correctly, once the original master is back<br>
online as a slave, its old messages will get consumed, meaning it's<br>
possible that we will get some old, previously consumed messages<br>
again. (Since we already consumed them earlier from the new master?)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No, as I said<br>
<quote><br>
The old, rejoined master becomes a slave, initially *empty* and<br>
unsynchronised.<br>
</quote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Matthias.<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><span>Front End Engineer �| �Group Commerce Inc.�</span><div><span>646-549-8891 | �<a href="mailto:evasilchenko@groupcommerce.com" target="_blank">evasilchenko@groupcommerce.com</a></span></div>
</div>