<div dir="ltr"><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Matthias,</font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">Thank's for replying my previous questions.</font></div>
<div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="tahoma, sans-serif">I use <a href="http://rabbitmq.1065348.n5.nabble.com/use-one-channel-for-many-consumers-producers-tp23312p23315.html" target="_blank">your solution</a> for my stations, and it's work. </font></div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Matthias Radestock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthias@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">matthias@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Mohsen,<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 12/11/12 16:15, Mohsen Lotfizad wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
soon I face socket descriptors limitations (it's actually 829). So I<br>
share the channel among producers:<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Why not just share the *connection*? I.e. give each producer its own channel but create all those channels on the same connection. Same for consumers.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Matthias.<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><font style="color:rgb(51,0,153);font-family:tahoma,sans-serif"><span><span><span><br><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">Sincerely </span><br style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">ML</span></span></span></span></font><br></div><br>
</div>