> Is it a possibility that firewall/network configuration between the two nodes is causing packets to get dropped?<br><br>It seems unlikely. The two nodes are on opposite sides of the US, so there's some normal latency between them. However, the connections are generally reliable and I'm pumping many messages/second through the federation before shutting the brokers down. (Xref my other thread about extraneous federation exchange traffic.)<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Tim Watson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim@rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">tim@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Matt<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On 13 Sep 2012, at 12:02, Simon MacMullen wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 13/09/12 01:00, Matt Pietrek wrote:<br>
>> {socket_error,etimedout}<br>
><br>
> So I think this is the interesting bit.<br>
><br>
> Clearly we should not be hanging around waiting for sockets to time out during shutdown (these are client sockets BTW, i.e. for federation links). But is there some sort of firewall or network weirdness that could be causing these timeouts?<br>
<br>
</div>Is it a possibility that firewall/network configuration between the two nodes is causing packets to get dropped?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>