<span style>OK, apparently there was a bit of flakiness in EC2's security. We</span><span style> forced a reapply of the rules by making a change and then undoing it, and now it clusters ok.</span><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Emile Joubert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:emile@rabbitmq.com">emile@rabbitmq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Michael,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On 16/03/12 18:37, Michael Cumings wrote:<br>
> So what is the considerations on having 5 over 10 or 1? Is there a<br>
> reasonable criteria that can be used to determine what an appropriate<br>
> number of ports that should be allocated?<br>
<br>
</div>Convenience only, I think. It is possible to configure one or as many<br>
unused ports as you like.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
-Emile<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>blogs:<br><a href="http://johnstoner.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://johnstoner.wordpress.com/</a><br>'In knowledge is power; in wisdom, humility.' <br>