<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:23 PM, steve flitcroft <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve.flitcroft@gmail.com">steve.flitcroft@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Rob,<br>
<br>
Not really the shared storage but the way the RabbitMq windows<br>
installer appends a guid to the service name means there is a<br>
difference between the nodes in the cluster therefore they do not play<br>
nice with the Cluster and Failover manager and everything has to be<br>
identical. I have got around this by manually creating the service<br>
using the earl service add.<br>
However I have moved on in my thoughts since I believe we need an<br>
Active/Active setup rather than Active/Passive.<br>
I think I am going to go with the use of HaProxy to load balance<br>
requests to a windows rabbitmq cluster.<br><br></blockquote><div><br>Ah, only just noticed that there is now an installer that is doing the registering.<br><br>Maybe the powers that be could be persuaded to add the -internalservicename option (simply using the same name as the service getting registered) into the appropriate erlsrv invocation in the installer?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Robby <br><br></div></div>