On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:23 PM, steve flitcroft <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steve.flitcroft@gmail.com">steve.flitcroft@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Rob,<br>
<br>
Not really the shared storage but the way the RabbitMq windows<br>
installer appends a guid to the service name means there is a<br>
difference between the nodes in the cluster therefore they do not play<br>
nice with the Cluster and Failover manager and everything has to be<br>
identical. I have got around this by manually creating the service<br>
using the earl service add.<br>
However I have moved on in my thoughts since I believe we need an<br>
Active/Active setup rather than Active/Passive.<br>
I think I am going to go with the use of HaProxy to load balance<br>
requests to a windows rabbitmq cluster.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>Ahhhh, yes, that pesky hex string at the end of the service name.<br><br>Find the script that registers the service, within there will be a call to erlsrv.<br><br>Add a command line option to erlsrv: -internalservicename "RabbitMQ_Service"<br>
or whatever nice name you want to use.<br><br>Maybe this will allow you to set things up in a nicer way?<br><br>/Robby<br><br></div></div>