<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>High-performance routing strategies</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13pt'>I am curious to know what routing strategies and broker topologies are being implemented for performance in similar scenarios of: <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><UL><LI><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13pt'>One broker must handle the load of 1000 distributed agents/clients
</SPAN></FONT><LI><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13pt'>A cluster of brokers handles 10,000 or more distributed agents/clients <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></UL><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13pt'><BR>
For each agent there innumerable routing configurations, are you going with more exchanges and queues/less routing keys or hierarchical routing schemes for instance and fewer exchanges and queues? Do you have test data to share that supports the choice you can share with me?<BR>
<BR>
Helena </SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>