Yes they connect to the same node... I was not clear in fact : is there a way to implement a kind of proxy that balance load ?<br>Publishers could then send messages transparently to a single adress.<br><br>Thanks<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/10/8 Matthias Radestock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthias@rabbitmq.com">matthias@rabbitmq.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Romain,<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 08/10/10 16:50, Romain Conseil wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Following to my previous post (high CPU load due to 10kHz messages), I<br>
tested clustering on a single node with the help of the tutorial.<br>
Everything is set correctly, 3 instances (one disk, 2 ram) on my single<br>
machine. When I start the message flow, I can see that the exhcnages are<br>
shared trhough the 3 nodes but nevertheless the cpu load is not balanced<br>
on the 3 nodes but only one. When reading I have understood that<br>
clustering was different from the load balancing I expected. Then how<br>
could I configure such a behaviour ?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Do your publishers connect to different nodes? If they all connect to the same node then that load gets all the load.<br>
<br>
<br>
Matthias.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>