<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Rafael Schloming <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rafaels@redhat.com">rafaels@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"></div>
I would differ with this slightly. Obviously if you need a production quality solution immediately, then you need to evaluate what projects and/or vendors offer right now, however I don't know if diving into a specification targeted at implementors is the best way to do that. Most likely you'll need to decide based on what features you need and whether/how they are exposed by the various implementations.<br>
<br>
On the other hand if you're interest does lie in the specification, the 1-0 document is specifically intended *not* to require any knowledge of prior versions to comprehend, and in some cases familiarity with older versions can even result in some confusion, although Michael's unofficial guide certainly helps with that.<br>
<br>
Either way, we could definitely use feedback from people who are reading the 1-0 version of the document with fresh eyes that are not weighed down by the baggage from earlier versions of the spec. So if you have a few hours to spare, any comments would be greatly appreciated, although due to the lack of production ready implementations, this may be as much for the benefit of the working group as it is for you in the short term.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br></font></blockquote><div><br>my interest in amqp comes has more than one aspect:<br>a) develop one particular app for production<br>b) my general interest in distributed programming (once used to work with CORBA, and implemented part of the in-house orb) <br>
c) write amqp smalltalk client mapping as my graduate thesis at college during this summer/autumn<br><br>a) would probably require 0.x version but potential customer has lost interest, at least in short term. Though, it would be very nice if viable 1.0 server implementation would exist somewhere around end of this year. <br>
<br>For b) and c) 1.0 seems to be a better choice, so I guess I will start with it. But I am afraid I will start reading into it more seriously in late june, which might be a bit late for your needs, but, well better ever then never :)<br>
<br>Thanks to all for advices.<br><br>Davorin Rusevljan<br><a href="http://www.cloud208.com/">http://www.cloud208.com/</a><br></div></div><br>