Thanks for the responses everyone. This gives me plenty of ammo!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Dunck <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jdunck@gmail.com">jdunck@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Garrett Smith <<a href="mailto:g@rre.tt">g@rre.tt</a>> wrote:<br>
...<br>
<div class="im">> The Erlang story behind rabbitmq, I think, is another compelling<br>
> point. As a quick exercise, if you haven't already, look over the<br>
> amount of source code for the rabbitmq server. If your impression is<br>
> anything like mine, you'll be surprised at how little code there is.<br>
<br>
</div>I don't think it's anecdotal; it's well-shown that cyclomatic<br>
complexity and LOC are the main determinants of bug count.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>