Also, which branch? I can't seem to find anything appropriate here:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-server">http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-server</a></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Brian Whitman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brian@echonest.com">brian@echonest.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Would love to try this out -- are there any configuration things I need to know about, or will a default build from the branch "just work"?<div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Alexis Richardson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alexis.richardson@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexis.richardson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Chuck - that's correct :-)<br>
<br>
Jack, all,<br>
<br>
The "page to disk" feature is now getting into QA and should be<br>
visible on a branch on the repo. �If you would like to help us QA this<br>
please speak out. �Matthias, as per usual, is in charge of getting<br>
this feature into a releasable state.<br>
<br>
The new feature enables messages that are persisted to exist on disk<br>
and not in memory. �Previously persisted data would remain in memory<br>
as well as being written to disk.<br>
<br>
More generally, you can still drain queues into any store<br>
programmatically, in the meantime.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
alexis<br>
</font><div><div></div><div><br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Chuck Remes<<a href="mailto:cremes.devlist@mac.com" target="_blank">cremes.devlist@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Perhaps I missed a config option, but I am running out of memory on<br>
>> the machines running rabbitmq-server.<br>
>><br>
>> I have two queues and two fanout exchanges (each queue is bound to one<br>
>> of the exchanges). � As the queue size grows so does memory use, even<br>
>> though both queues are durable. and the messages persistent. �Does<br>
>> rabbitmq require everything in memory as well even for persistent<br>
>> queues?<br>
><br>
> Regardless of queue type or settings, RabbitMQ stores all messages in<br>
> memory. There is work on a new "persister" ongoing in one of the<br>
> development branches to resolve this limitation. As far as I know<br>
> there hasn't been any date set for its release, but it should be<br>
> sometime this year.<br>
><br>
> cr<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com" target="_blank">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>