As a follow on to this, is there a roadmap document on the website anymore? I notice the link:<div><br></div><div> <a href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/roadmap.html">http://www.rabbitmq.com/roadmap.html</a></div><div><br></div>
<div>no longer resolves. I'm interested in the persistence improvements and would have a ballpark figure for availability, even in a test branch.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Keith<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Darien Kindlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:darien@kindlund.com">darien@kindlund.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
After doing some functionality comparisons between v1.5.x and v1.6.x<br>
branches, I have some basic questions about the upcoming release<br>
schedules.<br>
<br>
Specifically, I'm looking for a stable/tested (in other words,<br>
released) version of RabbitMQ that supports the following features:<br>
<br>
1) Basic QoS (allowing consumers to set the prefetch window to any<br>
number, preferably 1)<br>
2) Basic prioritization (allowing producers to set a priority of 1<br>
through 10 [according to the spec?]) which RabbitMQ attempts to honor<br>
on a best effort basis<br>
3) Clean compatibility with OpenAMQ's C library (aka WireAPI?) -- or<br>
clean compatibility with *some* type of C-based library that is<br>
compatible with a recent version of RabbitMQ (maybe:<br>
<a href="http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-c/" target="_blank">http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-c/</a> ?)<br>
4) [Ideally], headers exchange support -- although I can make due<br>
without this feature in the near term<br>
<br>
I realize the developers may be tackling other higher-priority items<br>
such as a high performance persister implementation, which may<br>
effectively block any v1.6.x release from happening anytime soon. I<br>
also know that most (if not all?) of the 4 features are already baked<br>
into the main RabbitMQ branch; however, some of the features still<br>
need to be QA'd.<br>
<br>
Can someone let me know if any of these features will be backported to<br>
a future v1.5.x release? If so, when would be an approximate<br>
timeframe? If not, is there any status update as to when a v1.6.x<br>
would be released? If there is no v1.6.x release timeframe, can you<br>
list out what are the major blockers are (aside from the persister<br>
problem)? I was also wondering if there were any external<br>
dependencies, such as a new AMQP spec version getting "ratified",<br>
before a v1.6.x gets released?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
-- Darien<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>