<div dir="ltr">Yep, I'm good for now, thanks.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Ben Hood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:0x6e6562@gmail.com">0x6e6562@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Edwin,<br>
<br>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Edwin Fine<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><<a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss_efine@usa.net">rabbitmq-discuss_efine@usa.net</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="Ih2E3d">> Thanks so much for looking into this and giving it your consideration. I'm<br>
> happy that you found it of some value. I was a bit worried that you would<br>
> have concerns about the performance of the modified code, given that it's no<br>
> longer a direct module call.<br>
<br>
</div>I shouldn't think this makes a difference, but having said that, it<br>
would be a good idea to test it.<br>
<br>
We are always interested in relative performance comparisons from the<br>
community (as long as they are tractable, that is).<br>
<br>
(And show Rabbit off in a good light :-)<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> I read your comments below with interest, and I<br>
> am watching and learning. I'll be very curious to see the actual finished<br>
> code when it's released. I'm glad the direct driver problem was just a<br>
> commented-out line of code - I admit I did do it all in a hurry as a proof<br>
> of concept.<br>
><br>
> I have in the meantime created my own little rabbitmq_common application,<br>
> used only by the Erlang client, and it is all working famously and nicely<br>
> decoupled from the server. I trust that the changes you are talking about<br>
> will come out in the next release of RabbitMQ, so when that happens, I'll<br>
> change my code to use the "official" client and whatever the common app is<br>
> called.<br>
<br>
</div>OK, so you are good for now?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Ben<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>