<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><br><html>Begin forwarded message:</html><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><b><br></b></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; min-height: 14px; "><br></div> </div>Matthias,<br><br>On 16 Apr 2008, at 07:50, Matthias Radestock wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite">Michael, and anybody else who can spare a couple of minutes,<br></blockquote><br><blockquote type="cite">The CPU consumption of the Erlang process reported in step 9 should be near 0% at the end of both tests. However, on some systems the second test leaves the Erlang process consuming 100% CPU, though the Erlang shell remains responsive. I am interested in finding out which systems exhibit this behaviour and which don't.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">When reporting your results please include information about your system (if you are on Unix just run 'uname -a') and Erlang version (the version number displayed when starting the Erlang shell will do just fine).<br></blockquote><br>I can reproduce this as well using R12B-0.<br><br>gr8:sock_spin 0x6e6562$ uname -a<br>Darwin host46.msm.che.vodafone 9.2.2 Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar 4 21:17:34 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.4.31~1/RELEASE_I386 i386<br><br>HTH,<br><br>Ben<br></blockquote></div><br></body></html>