I was thinking that I could probably get the Java Qpid broker to support AMQP 0-9 (non-WIP) if there is demand. For the production uses of Qpid that I know about 0-8 is all that will be used however.<br><br>Martin - does OpenAMQ still accept clients wanting to talk 0-8 to it? I can't remember any changes off the top of my head between 0-8 and 0-9 (non-WIP) that would prevent a 0-9 broker from accepting communication from a 0-8 client [sorry for hijacking a Rabbit-MQ list for a Qpid / OpenAMQ question].
<br><br>Thanks,<br>Rob<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 23/08/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Martin Sustrik</b> <<a href="mailto:sustrik@imatix.com">sustrik@imatix.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>> I don't recall any others off the top of my head. I think OpemAMQ<br>> doesn't implement persistence across broker restarts but that is a<br>> design decision and doesn't affect what clients need to do.
<br>><br>> For the client at least, most of the differences between 8.0 (0.8 has<br>> the major/minor version swapped in the xml file) and 0.9 are handled by<br>> just swapping the automatically generated framing definitions file.
<br><br>This 0.8/0.9 thing is quite annoying... We would even revert to 0.8 to<br>get compatibility with RabbitMQ and Qpid, but we desperately need<br>Queue.Unbind which was added only in 0.9. Without Queue.Unbind we would
<br>face severe performance problems in production :(<br><br>Sorry about that.<br><br>Martin (OpenAMQ team)<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>rabbitmq-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com">
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com</a><br><a href="http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss">http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss</a><br></blockquote></div><br>