KGanann at kroll.com
Thu Jul 24 18:46:36 BST 2014
Sounds more like B. It seems to be the federation pieces I can't kill.
From: Simon MacMullen [mailto:simon at rabbitmq.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:53 AM
To: Legacy list about RabbitMQ; Ganann, Kale
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] rabbitmqadmin
On 23/07/14 18:39, Ganann, Kale wrote:
> I've seen some issues with deleting vhosts in earlier versions - is
> that still an issue with this version?
26088 fix failure to delete virtual host if a queue in the virtual host
is deleted concurrently (since 1.0.0) (incorrectly reported
fixed in 3.2.4)
26176 prevent deadlock deleting virtual host with active federation
link on single core machine (since 3.0.0)
Could either of those be what you're seeing?
This communication contains information that is confidential,
proprietary in nature, and may also be attorney-client privileged
and/or work product privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) or
the person responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient(s), please note that any form of dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying
to this message and delete this email immediately. Thank you for your cooperation.
Please be advised that neither Altegrity, its affiliates, its employees
or agents accept liability for any errors, omissions or damages
caused by delays of receipt or by any virus infection in this
message or its attachments, or which may otherwise arise as a
result of this e-mail transmission.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss