[rabbitmq-discuss] Any message priority support schedule?

[Chris]

Thanks for the update.  In our use case, we potentially have hundreds of
queues.  While we could multiply by the # of priorities, it would be a lot
cleaner if we didn't have too.  It would also prevent us from having to
modify all of our consumers to deal with multiple priority queues.

I think that true priorities would make the queue topology a lot simpler
(and smaller) and the consumer implementation a lot simpler as well.  It
would also allow a smoother transition to RabbitMQ for those already using
priorities in other AMQP brokers (like Qpid) or JMS brokers (like
ActiveMQ).  IMHO, it's surprising that more people aren't asking for this,
but I guess it is what it is.

Thanks (as always) for the response and suggestions!

-Chris


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com>wrote:

> On 13 Jan 2014, at 18:42, Michael Klishin <mklishin at gopivotal.com> wrote:
>
> > …and give different priorities to consumers on those queues:
> > http://www.rabbitmq.com/consumer-priority.html
>
> Actually, this is incorrect, consumer priorities assume a shared queue.
> --
> MK
>
> Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20140113/203c2158/attachment.html>