[rabbitmq-discuss] Dynamic Shovel and HA with 3.3

[Michael Klishin]

On 7 April 2014 at 00:51:13, Viswanathan Ramachandran (vish.ramachandran at gmail.com) wrote:
> > 4. If master fails in an HA queue consumed by shovel in slave,  
> will shovel take care of re-consumption from new queue? With  
> the 3.3 enhancement of clients not needing to reconsume, I guess  
> this should work seamlessly with shovels as well?

Shovel uses a regular (Erlang) client, so yes, it should. 

> 5. Dynamic shovels don't allow detailed configuration. Are  
> the queues declared configured for no loss in messages? Namely  
> durable, acknowledge on explicit confirm etc?

When Shovel declares a queue because it does not exist, it is declared
as durable. Explicit acknowledgements are used by default but this can be user-configured.

--  
MK  

Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ