[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ 3.2 and federated queues

Mariusz Gronczewski xani666 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 27 15:56:40 BST 2013


2013/9/27 Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com>

> On 27/09/2013 2:16PM, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
>
>> I've tested it for a bit and have another question: Is federating
>> autogenerated (amq.*) queues planned (on current nightly trying to
>> federate those returns "queue name contains reserved prefix amq") or it
>> is something that should not be used at all ?
>>
>
> Hmm. That's kinda problematic - you shouldn't be able to declare your own
> named queue in the server-generated namespace. But the downstream federated
> queue is just another AMQP client from the perspective of the upstream, so
> it can't violate that requirement.
>

Not sure if that's the right thing to do, but that's how it is now. Hmm.
>

> Of course, you could have your client generate a reply queue name based on
> a UUID or something, that would get round the problem.
>



More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list