[rabbitmq-discuss] memory leak rabbitmq 3.1.5

[Santi Nuñez-Cacho]

It was the connetion to the mcollective rabbitmq middleware. ( we 've got
all the machines connected to mcollective )

I removed the mcollective conection. Disabling it. And restarting the
rabbitmq-server.

That's we got now


[root at rabbit03.bcn rabbitmq]# lsof -i :61613
COMMAND    PID     USER   FD   TYPE  DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
beam.smp 17472 rabbitmq   21u  IPv6 4652854      0t0  TCP *:61613 (LISTEN)
[root at rabbit03.bcn rabbitmq]#  rabbitmqctl eval
'length(supervisor:which_children(rabbit_stomp_client_sup_sup)).'
50
...done.
[root at rabbit03.bcn rabbitmq]#

And the process growing...




On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 26/09/2013 1:51PM, Santi Nuñez-Cacho wrote:
>
>> I expect 0 stomp connetions. The unique one connection on 61613 should
>> be the cluster one.
>>
>
> Port 61613 is not used for clustering, it's just stomp.
>
>
>  [root at rabbit03.bcn ~]#  rabbitmqctl eval
>> 'length(supervisor:which_**children(rabbit_stomp_client_**sup_sup)).'
>> 3802
>> ...done.
>> [root at rabbit03.bcn ~]# lsof -i :61613
>> COMMAND    PID     USER   FD   TYPE  DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
>> ruby      5638     root    6u  IPv4   25097      0t0  TCP
>> rabbit03.bcn.softonic.lan:**59851->rabbit:61613 (ESTABLISHED)
>> beam.smp 27183 rabbitmq   21u  IPv6 4521334      0t0  TCP *:61613 (LISTEN)
>>
>
> Ah.
>
> So you have one connection, from some ruby script. But 3802 connection
> processes. So something is somehow leaking. Thank you for reporting this
> bug.
>
> But to help get to the bottom of it - what is that ruby script doing?
>
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, Pivotal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130926/6e8c2c00/attachment.htm>