[rabbitmq-discuss] clustered ram node loosing its membership without being reset

Mon Sep 23 11:33:56 BST 2013

On 20/09/13 18:24, Sigismondo Boschi wrote:
> IMHO a more reasonable behavior would be that node02, when started with
> node01 being down, not being able to find any reference peer, and being
> ram based, should just fail.

> Can you confirm this is a bug, or if the intended behavior, what is the
> rationale?

No, it's a bug. I'm sure it used to work the way you describe.

Cheers, Simon

-- 
Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, Pivotal