[rabbitmq-discuss] Alternative to "immediate" in RabbitMQ 3.x

[Matthias Radestock]

On 21/10/13 22:19, Chris wrote:
> It's a little more than presence.  It is not enough to know the service
> is running-- I need to know if it can handle a message right now.  So I
> guess I would need to use a solution to keep track not only of presence
> but of capacity-- which might be hard to do in a transactional manner.
>
> Still-- your point is taken and may be the best solution given the
> requirements and capabilities.

I actually think the two-queues solution you proposed would work well.

Matthias.