[rabbitmq-discuss] RabbitMQ 3.0.3 overload memory watermark

Simon MacMullen simon at rabbitmq.com
Thu Nov 14 10:39:12 GMT 2013

On 14/11/13 09:16, Emile Joubert wrote:
> On 14/11/13 03:20, tin wrote:
>> Do you have any ideas about this problem?
> If you upgrade to the latest version then you get greater control over
> when the broker starts paging messages to disk.

It's also worth bearing in mind that we've fixed several memory leak 
bugs around HA since 3.0.3.

Cheers, Simon

Simon MacMullen
RabbitMQ, Pivotal

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list