[rabbitmq-discuss] More throughput using cluster

Michael Klishin michael.s.klishin at gmail.com
Sun May 19 16:26:29 BST 2013


2013/5/19 Nikola Savic <niks at osic.rs>

> We're not using basic_consume, since we must monitor two different
> channels/exchanges (one direct and one fannout). This is because workers
> must get messages (task related) by direct queue, and broadcasts over
> fannout


You should be able to do this easily with any client using basic.consume.

Also, sounds like a suitable use case for exchangeo-to-exchange bindings:

http://www.rabbitmq.com/e2e.html
-- 
MK

http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130519/8e8b1c7e/attachment.htm>


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list