[rabbitmq-discuss] Scaling Throughput with Highly Available Queues

[Richard Raseley]

Ron,

You have a couple options (that I know of) if your requirements include a
*single* cluster (which was not my case):

1) Increase the resources (CPU, disk, memory, network, etc.) which are
available to the nodes which are hosting the master queue processes.

2) Ensure that the master queue processes are spread out evenly across the
available nodes.

Regards,

Richard


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Cordell, Ron
<Ron.Cordell at relayhealth.com>wrote:

>  Sorry for jumping in here, but I’m a little confused on how to scale
> throughput in the HA scenario. If I assume that all queue are mirrored
> queues on a single cluster then what are my options to adding more
> throughput should I need to?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com [mailto:
> rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard
> Raseley
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:36 PM
> *To:* Discussions about RabbitMQ
> *Subject:* Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Scaling Throughput with Highly
> Available Queues****
>
> ** **
>
> Matthias,****
>
> ** **
>
> I am glad that you were able to anticipate where I was heading - that
> means I am not completely insane (at least as it relates to this). =]****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, I understand that they are actually two separate queues (I am
> treating them as one logical one for purposes of discussion). In this case
> the lack of order preservation and visibility from one cluster to the other
> isn't an issue for us. We decided not to go with two queues for the
> transparency reasons you mentioned. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks so much for your time today.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Richard****
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130319/ad55ff26/attachment.htm>