[rabbitmq-discuss] Confirm consistent hash exchange behavior

[Brett Cameron]

Could you possibly get around this by extending Alvaro's idea a little bit,
and have consumers do a basic.reject with requeue=true on messages (queue
names) consumed from the "lock" queue?

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Matthias Radestock
<matthias at rabbitmq.com>wrote:

> On 15/03/13 21:56, Alvaro Videla wrote:
>
>> - Create queues 1, 2, .... N
>> - Bind queues to the CHX
>> - publish the queue names to a queue called "lock" for example.
>> [etc]
>>
>
> With that approach the number of consumers must be exactly the same as the
> number of queues; if you have fewer then some messages won't get consumed,
> and if you have more then some consumers won't process any messages.
>
> Furthermore, you cannot add/remove queues since that will cause some
> subsequent messages to get routed to different queues than prior to the
> queue addition/removal. They will then be picked up by different consumers.
>
> Matthias.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130316/c063cffc/attachment.htm>