[rabbitmq-discuss] Overriding rabbit_auth_mechanism_plain

[Ben Hood]

On Wednesday, 13 March 2013 at 13:01, Simon MacMullen wrote:

> Hmm, I don't think we really imagined people would be overriding what 
> existing mechanisms did, we mainly thought people might write new ones.
> 
> But I don't think what you're doing is too evil.

Yes, it does feel a bit strange to want to override an existing mechanism. However, I'd like the SASL handling to be transparent to clients so ideally I need to replace the default handler for SASL/PLAIN. 

So given that it doesn't sound too evil, I think I'll proceed with this for now.

Thanks for the review,

Ben 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130313/240da29e/attachment.htm>