[rabbitmq-discuss] Causing publisher confirmations nacks for testing?
tim at rabbitmq.com
Thu Jun 20 10:32:29 BST 2013
On 20 Jun 2013, at 10:28, Tim Watson wrote:
> Would the broker not send basic.nack on a channel in confirm mode if the message was un-routable?
Oh please ignore me, that's not the case!
> On 20 Jun 2013, at 10:14, Emile Joubert wrote:
>> On 19/06/13 19:30, Ty Sarna wrote:
>>> I'm working with publisher confirmations, and I'd like to verify that my
>>> nack-handling logic is correct. Is there some way I can make RabbitMQ
>>> nack on demand, for testing purposes?
>> No, I don't think there is a simple way of prompting the broker to send
>> a basic.nack. But there is very little value in handling basic.nack
>> specially because the integrity of a broker that ever did send a
>> basic.nack would probably be compromised.
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss