[rabbitmq-discuss] C++ client options

[Alan Antonuk]

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au> wrote:

> The most important thing will be demonstrating how it integrates with
> higher level code, particularly if the high level code is using an event
> loop other than the one you choose yourself.  E.g. will the end user have
> to run your event loop in a thread and when they get callbacks from your
> code, they will have to pass data to their own event loop thread in a
> thread-safe manner?
>

Noted.

>
> Another thing that comes to mind is the question of adding an abstraction
> layer, just like JMS in the Java world.  The only one I've come across so
> far is OpenMAMA:
> http://www.openmama.org - do you believe RabbitMQ users could benefit
> from coding to the OpenMAMA API and using some low-level driver for AMQP or
> RabbitMQ specifically?  This would be more like the JMS programming
> paradigm.
>

I believe something like this would be something layered on top of the
protocol library, and not necessarily baked into the library itself. As to
whether you should go this direction, I would imagine it depends on the
requirements for whatever you're doing.

>
>
> I'd like to understand your feelings about the future of the API before
> committing to that - do you see something based on libuv happening in the
> near future, e.g. within 6 months?
>
>
> I don't plan on making any drastic API changes to SimpleAmqpClient, its
purpose in my eyes is to give an easy interface to using rabbitmq-c from
C++, so it will continue to develop SimpleAmqpClient to support the various
bits of functionality that rabbitmq-c supports.  A libuv-based library will
likely be developed under a different library name, whether or not the
functionality gets rolled back into an existing library is TBD.  Will this
happen in 6 months? I have no idea - it depends on how much free time I
have to work on these kinds of projects.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130808/9133eb6e/attachment.htm>