[rabbitmq-discuss] Chat backend with chatrooms, design/performance question
mklishin at gopivotal.com
Sat Aug 3 14:22:20 BST 2013
Mathias Stjernström escribió:
> 2. We use one Fanout Exchange per room
> Anyone have ideas/thoughts of which would be better in a
> performance/scalabillity point of view?
1 fanout exchange per room, and one server-named queue per chat
participant. Then extremely busy rooms will have less effect on other rooms.
Exchange-to-Exchange bindings offer another alternative but it's hard to
predict how it's going to perform and it's more complicated conceptually.
And, like with any performance considerations, I highly recommend
you to benchmark both approaches and see what the data says.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss