[rabbitmq-discuss] Federated Link Not Producing Logging

Richard Raseley richard at raseley.com
Thu Apr 11 21:17:27 BST 2013


Simon,

I discovered that I had indeed not completed the second step shortly after
sending that message - doh!

Regards,

Richard


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> You need to do two things for federation to work:
>
> 1) Define one or more upstreams.
> 2) Define a policy to determine which exchanges are federated.
>
> You don't mention having done the second - have you done so?
>
> Cheers, Simon
>
>
> On 10/04/13 19:18, Richard Raseley wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to created a federated link between two clusters
>> (Cluster01 and Cluster02) over a custom port configured for SSL. On
>> Cluster01 I define Cluster02 as upstream, and on Cluster02 I define
>> Cluster01 as the upstream (I am doing this all through the management UI).
>>
>> After applying the changes, neither cluster shows as having an active
>> federated link, yet there are no errors or events of any kind logged
>> related to federation in /var/log/rabbitmq/rabbitmq.**log. Any ideas why
>> this might be?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20130411/73d3436b/attachment.htm>


More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list