[rabbitmq-discuss] is anybody using 'immediate' publish?
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Fri Sep 14 15:20:20 BST 2012
On 14/09/12 15:09, Ask Solem wrote:
> Couldn't it be possible emulate immediate by delivering to a TTL'ed
> queue, then having a dead-letter queue that the publisher consumes
> from to be notified that a message has not been consumed?
Yes. It's not an exact emulation, but arguably more flexible, e.g. it
gives greater control over how the 'returned' messages are dealt with.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss