[rabbitmq-discuss] is anybody using 'immediate' publish?

[Matthias Radestock]

On 14/09/12 15:09, Ask Solem wrote:
> Couldn't it be possible emulate immediate by delivering to a TTL'ed
> queue, then having a dead-letter queue that the publisher consumes
> from to be notified that a message has not been consumed?

Yes. It's not an exact emulation, but arguably more flexible, e.g. it 
gives greater control over how the 'returned' messages are dealt with.

Matthias.