[rabbitmq-discuss] is anybody using 'immediate' publish?

Brett Cameron brett.r.cameron at gmail.com
Fri Sep 14 08:49:23 BST 2012


I'd support this move. Have never used "immediate".


Sent from my iPod

On 14/09/2012, at 4:32 AM, Matthias Radestock <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> Dear Rabbit users,
> AMQP's basic.publish method has two flags - mandatory and immediate - that trigger checks at the server and result in messages getting returned to clients with basic.return when the necessary conditions aren't met. See http://www.rabbitmq.com/amqp-0-9-1-reference.html#basic.publish for the details.
> I can just about see why 'mandatory' may be useful, but 'immediate' has always struck me as a bizarre and I fear that anybody using it may well do so w/o fully understanding the semantics - can't blame them, it *is* bizarre. Because of that, and since it complicates the code in many places, we are considering dropping support for 'immediate'.
> So is anybody actually using the 'immediate' flag?
> Regards,
> Matthias.
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list