[rabbitmq-discuss] Field Type 'A'
Laing, Michael P.
Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Mon Oct 15 16:24:57 BST 2012
Ah so it does.
Then the table is misleading in my opinion, causing developers for
'unsupported' clients to mistakenly implement the column in the table and
think they are done. Not the desired outcome, and an understandable
oversight by the nodejs-amqp author, I think.
Plus the comment is ambiguous as it says that field-array type is
implemented but not which tag is used. It should also be placed in C above
to make it clear that it goes with the table.
Or perhaps a RabbitMQ column separate from Qpid would make sense.
On 10/15/12 11:10 AM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>On 15/10/12 15:59, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> In http://www.rabbitmq.com/amqp-0-9-1-errata.html#section_3 it says that
>> Field Type 'A' is not supported by RabbitMQ.
>It actually says:
>RabbitMQ continues to use the tags in the third column, and implements
>the field-array type in the broker and at least the "supported" clients.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss