[rabbitmq-discuss] memory flow control
matthias at rabbitmq.com
Thu Oct 4 15:54:37 BST 2012
On 04/10/12 11:47, Raviv Pavel wrote:
> I think I've read somewhere that it's not currently possible.
> I need the same thing :(
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:47:18 PM UTC+2, Dmitriy Stolyarov wrote:
> Is there a way to have the producer throw an exception instead of
> just being blocked when high memory water mark is reached on the
> server? (Using java client)
Why you would want to treat this condition any different from a network
delay/disruption or a slow server?
It possible to detect that, indirectly, using a technique I described in
(which I shall henceforth call "user level EWOULDBLOCK" ;)
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss