[rabbitmq-discuss] is mine normal, fast, or lame ?

[Tim Watson]

On 21/05/12 11:49, Tim Watson wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 04:20, bino oetomo wrote:
>> Dear all.
>> I do a performance test.
>>
>> 1. engine1 :
>> RabbitMQ server with 5 shovel.
>> This 5 shovel have different name , but other config is identical.
>> 2. engine2 :
>> Remote located RabbitMQ
>>
>> Connection engine1<<====>>engine2 : 1mbps clear
>>
>> The test :
>> 1. I stop rabbitMQ at engine2
>> 2. Load 800000 line of msg , average of 250 character per msg
>> 3. When it done , I start RabbitMQ at engine2 .... and put my eyes at
>> it's management web UI.
>>
>> Result :
>> 1. engine1 : 'Acknowledge' box best rate is only 47 msg/s
>> 2. engine2: the 'Ready' box always said between 350-400 msg/s
>>

Is the 'Acknowledge' box the broker with the 5 shovels? I'm not 100% 
clear on what you're trying to achieve here, but why have 5 shovels from 
1 broker to another?

>> Is that normal, fast, or lame ?
>>
>
> So this all depends on your configuration. There are a few things you 
> can look at - can you post the whole configuration you're using 
> (scrubbed of any private data if that's applicable) so we can take a 
> look?
>
>> will that any effect on running multiple shovel with identical config ?
>>
>> Sincerely
>> -bino-
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
>> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss