[rabbitmq-discuss] Highly Available Cluster

stone zmstone at gmail.com
Mon May 21 13:00:34 BST 2012

Hi Simon

Does it has to be exactly the reversed order to start all the nodes in case
more than two nodes in a cluster ?
And if all the nodes are stopped, how do I tell in which order should they
be started ? check the logs ?


On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Simon MacMullen <simon at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

> On 21/05/12 12:21, rui.favas at barclays.com wrote:
>> Its actually the other way around…. Starting server1 always appears to
>> work even when server2 is down!! but I cannot start server2 without
>> starting server1 first.
> If you stop server2 then stop server1, then you will need to start server1
> first. You always need to first start the last node to shut down.
> Does that make sense?
> Cheers, Simon
> --
> Simon MacMullen
> RabbitMQ, VMware
> ______________________________**_________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.**rabbitmq.com<rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com>
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**rabbitmq-discuss<https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120521/f84ba7e8/attachment.htm>

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list