[rabbitmq-discuss] Pika 0.9.5 KeyError: Tx.SelectOk

[Matt Pietrek]

Cool, and thanks. Just wanted to make sure you knew about it in case it
hadn't been seen before.

Matt

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Gavin M. Roy <gmr at myyearbook.com> wrote:

>  Hi Matt,
>
> I'll have to go back through and look at the fixed bugs. I know I've
> applied a fair amount of fixes to BlockingConnection, I'd not be surprised
> if this was one of them. There is a known blocker in Github master right
> now, but I expect to see 0.9.6 drop "real soon"
>
> Feel free to check the issues list at http://github.com/pika/pika
>
> Gavin
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Matt Pietrek wrote:
>
> I'm experiencing a KeyError exception, where the key is "Tx.SelectOk" when
> using Pika 0.9.5.
>
> The scenario: A simple program that simply writes two messages a second to
> a queue. While this test is running, I stop the broker, then restart it a
> few seconds later. I explicitly check for AMQPConnectionError exceptions,
> and if seen reconnect to the broker. About half the time, the test works as
> intended. However, other times I see the KeyError exception, which my guess
> is not what's intended.
>
> My writing code looks like this:
>             try:
>                 channel = self._channel
>                 channel.tx_select()
>                 channel.basic_publish(exchange='',
>                     routing_key=queue_name,
>                     body=json_string,
>                     properties=pika.BasicProperties(delivery_mode=2))
>                 channel.tx_commit()
>                 return
>             except AMQPConnectionError as e:
>                 self._reconnect()
>
> Digging into the traceback data, the faulting line is in
> Pika's blocking_connection.py:rpc()
>
>         # Find our reply in our list of replies
>         for reply in self._replies:
>             if reply in replies:
> *                frame = self._frames[reply] # THIS HERE IS THE LINE*
>                 self._received_response = True
>                 if callback:
>                     callback(frame)
>                 del(self._frames[reply])
>                 return frame
>
> Known issue? Expected and acceptable? Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
> https://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120314/7e360ea7/attachment.htm>