[rabbitmq-discuss] Can RabbitMQ handle big messages?

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

On 12 March 2012 12:23, Zabrane Mickael <zabrane3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Matthew Sackman wrote:
>
> For those of us struggling to follow this, if you're currently in the
> act of receiving data from node X, why can't you assume node X is still
> alive? I.e. what is wrong with treating arbitrary data from node X as
> evidence it's still alive, in lieu of a heartbeat from node X?
>
>
> http://learnyousomeerlang.com/distribunomicon
>

Yes, that repeats the information that Irmo started this subthread with. It
doesn't address Matthew's question at all, though.

Perhaps the erlang list is a better place for us to be asking about this,
Matthew, since it's not directly about Rabbit - are you on that list? I'm
not currently subscribed.

Tony
-- 
Tony Garnock-Jones
tonygarnockjones at gmail.com
http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/tonyg/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-discuss/attachments/20120312/7844739d/attachment.htm>