[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation: Superfluous bindings in Exchanges

Laing, Michael P. Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Fri Jul 20 19:52:31 BST 2012

Thanks Matthias, 

I plan to keeping pushing on federation as it is becoming foundational to
our messaging architecture.

Thanks very much for your prompt and effective assistance!

Best regards,


On 7/20/12 2:40 PM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:

>On 19/07/12 20:01, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> I have sent reports to you separately. -ml
>It's a bug. Cyclic topologies leak bindings.
>I am amazed that this a) was missed by us (since we definitely
>considered cycles during the federation design), b) hasn't been reported
>before. Oh well.

More information about the rabbitmq-discuss mailing list