[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation: Superfluous bindings in Exchanges
Laing, Michael P.
Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Fri Jul 20 19:52:31 BST 2012
I plan to keeping pushing on federation as it is becoming foundational to
our messaging architecture.
Thanks very much for your prompt and effective assistance!
On 7/20/12 2:40 PM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>On 19/07/12 20:01, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> I have sent reports to you separately. -ml
>It's a bug. Cyclic topologies leak bindings.
>I am amazed that this a) was missed by us (since we definitely
>considered cycles during the federation design), b) hasn't been reported
>before. Oh well.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss