[rabbitmq-discuss] Federation: Superfluous bindings in Exchanges
Laing, Michael P.
Michael.Laing at nytimes.com
Fri Jul 20 19:52:31 BST 2012
Thanks Matthias,
I plan to keeping pushing on federation as it is becoming foundational to
our messaging architecture.
Thanks very much for your prompt and effective assistance!
Best regards,
Michael
On 7/20/12 2:40 PM, "Matthias Radestock" <matthias at rabbitmq.com> wrote:
>Michael,
>
>On 19/07/12 20:01, Laing, Michael P. wrote:
>> I have sent reports to you separately. -ml
>
>Thanks.
>
>It's a bug. Cyclic topologies leak bindings.
>
>I am amazed that this a) was missed by us (since we definitely
>considered cycles during the federation design), b) hasn't been reported
>before. Oh well.
>
>Regards,
>
>Matthias.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss
mailing list